Capacity Building
Our capacity building approach begins from identification of gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes required to achieve personal, business or organizational objectives. The facilitation and delivery techniques are adapted to the training needs. We provide coaching, mentoring or hands on skill development trainings to staff at different levels to develop their individual capabilities.
Our work to date has focused on improving employability of the youth and entrepreneurial capacity of the youth through skill development and business development and entrepreneurship training. We have also offered analytical skills as well as conceptual understanding of quantitative and qualitative research findings to staff of different organizations. Our clients are business executives, monitoring and evaluation professionals as well as government executives.
Research and Analytics
Interpreting and reporting data brings meaning and context to the numbers. Translating raw data into digestible insights for informed decision-making and effective stakeholder communication is critical. We explore data through statistical and qualitative techniques to discover patterns, correlations, and insights during data analysis stage. It’s about extracting the essence of the data we gathered and translating numbers into knowledge. Whether applying descriptive statistics, conducting regression analysis, or using thematic coding for qualitative data, this process drives decision-making and charts the path toward actionable outcomes for our clients. Depending on our clients’ distinct data analysis needs, we provide tailored analytical services ranging from need assessment, baseline survey, monitoring and evaluation, mid-term evaluation and end-line evaluation.
Need assessment
A needs assessment helps to determine what needs to be accomplished to reach our clients’ project goals. This assessment of needs then informs a project’s overall plan and approaches by helping our clients identify targeted strategies and prioritize resources. Needs assessments serve as incredibly powerful tools for decision making, resource allocation, and ultimately reaching programmatic goals. They can be utilized across a range of settings (e.g., community, school, and hospital, state) to shed light on a variety of topics. It’s important to conduct needs assessment at the onset of the project, so that programs are appropriately tailored to the individuals and communities our clients serve.
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
Monitoring and evaluation is the process of regularly collecting data in order to identify successes, challenges, and areas for improvement. With this process, our team is able to measure the progress and effectiveness of projects we are working on. The monitoring process is ongoing, which helps the evaluating team to stay on track and make adjustments as needed. Evaluation enables our clients to learn from experiences, understand what works and what doesn’t, and make decisions about the future. Ultimately, monitoring and evaluation is key to any successful project. It involves setting goals and objectives in order to measure progress and track performance.
Our M&E approach follows the following steps:
- Define the purpose and scope of the M&E system
- Stakeholder Mapping; beneficiary Identification
- Programme and M&E Design
- Defining the Theoretical Framework
- Defining the Logic, Mapping the Indicators
- Milestone Identification, planning and scheduling
- Designing the Instruments; selecting the tools
- Implement and Monitor
- Analyze
- Produce M&E report
Endline Evaluation
The purpose for the evaluation is to assess the performance of intervention undertaken by our clients and capture change over time of all baseline indicators from beginning to end of program implementation. The evaluation will determine to what extent projects has delivered effective, relevant, and timely activities to beneficiaries. The evaluation will be complemented by a significant learning aspect for all stakeholders by providing concrete and actionable recommendations for future improvement.
Effectiveness:
Through end-line evaluation, we will seek to respond to the evaluation questions around effectiveness:
- To what extent have the planned objectives in the log frame of the project been reached, per indicator, disaggregated by sub groups?
- Did interventions reach the appropriate target groups and individuals within the target areas?
- To what extent have the project activities contributed to the overall goal
- What were the major factors and constraints influencing the achievement of the objectives of the project? What are the main reasons that the project provided or failed to provide to its target beneficiaries the assistance proposed at design stage?
- Have proper accountability and risk management framework(s) been in place to minimize risks on program implementation?
Satisfaction
It is important to include beneficiaries’ opinion on the quality of the services received.
- To what extent were beneficiaries informed about how to use the project assistance and services.
- To what extent were beneficiaries able to access the services?
- What challenges/barriers did the beneficiaries face while accessing the assistance/services?
- To what extent were participants faced with safety issues during their participation?
- How do beneficiaries perceive the relevance of the project to meet the project’s objective and how have the activities implemented improved their lives? Are there any stories of change?
- How satisfied are beneficiaries with the quality of the various components of the program (food security, wash and protection)?
- How has the collaboration between the partner and community stakeholders contributed to appropriate response and understanding of needs and priorities of the beneficiaries?
- To what extent was the project participatory in all the project cycle?
- How quickly and effectively were protection issues addressed?
Adaptability/Flexibility
The end line evaluation should assess the overall quality of the implementation.
- To what extent was project able to adapt and provide appropriate response to context changes and emerging local needs, and the priorities of beneficiaries?
- What mechanisms are in place to track project implementation of the project? (i.e. internal monitoring, evaluation, accountability, learning (MEAL) and quality assurance mechanisms)?
- How have they been utilized to increase quality within the project?
- What alterations were made (if any) to the program design in terms of collaboration during the implementation phase based on the reality on ground?
- To what extent did the project interventions contribute to build long-term community capacity?
Lessons
Our end-line evaluations shall also provide concrete and actionable recommendations based on the findings for areas to improve, gaps in delivery and beneficiary satisfaction, and improvement to program implementation that can be incorporated into future program design
- What lessons were learned regarding program design, targeting, and implementation?
- What opportunities exist within project to reach more beneficiaries with the available budget or to reduce costs while reaching at least the same number of beneficiaries without compromising quality?
- What were the best practices?
- How effective were the project management, systems, and processes established by the project?
Data Collection
Our Institute believes effective data collection is essential for evidence based decision making. Our approach in data collection follows the following steps:
1. Defining the goal
Defining the goal is a crucial first step. We engage relevant stakeholders and team members in an iterative and collaborative process to establish clear goals. It’s important that projects start with the identification of key questions and desired outcomes to ensure we focus our efforts on gathering the right information.
We start by understanding the purpose of the project– what problem our clients are trying to solve, or what change do they want to bring about? We think about the project’s potential outcomes and obstacles and try to anticipate what kind of data would be useful in these scenarios. We consider the type of our clients who will be using the data we collect and what data would be the most valuable to them. We think about the long-term effects of the project and how it can be measured over time. Lastly, we leverage any historical data from previous projects to help our clients refine key questions that may have been overlooked previously.
2. Identifying the data sources
The crucial next step in the research process is determining the potential data sources. Essentially, there are two main data types to choose from: primary and secondary.
- Primary data is the information one can collect directly from first-hand engagements. It’s gathered specifically for the research at hand and tailored to the research questions. Primary data collection methods can range from surveys and interviews to focus groups and observations. Because we design the data collection process, primary data can offer precise, context-specific information directly related to the research objectives.
- Secondary data, on the other hand, is derived from resources that already exist. This can include information gathered for other research projects, administrative records, historical documents, statistical databases, and more. While not originally collected for the specific study, secondary data can offer valuable insights and background information that complement the primary data.
3. Choosing the data collection method
When choosing the data collection method, there are many options at our disposal. Depending on the type of data collection method that suits the project at hand we employ quantitative or qualitative surveys. It can be done by administering structured questionnaires on-line, by phone or in-person. It can also be done through less structured interview guides such as in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), Key Informant Interviews (KIIs).
4. Determining the sampling method
Once we establish our data collection goals and how we’ll collect the data, the next step is deciding whom to collect the data from. Sampling involves carefully selecting a representative group from a larger population. Choosing the right sampling method is crucial for gathering representative and relevant data that aligns with the data collection goal.
We consider the following guidelines to choose the appropriate sampling method for the research goal and data collection method:
- Understand the Target Population: Start by conducting thorough research of the target population. Understand who they are, their characteristics, and subgroups within the population.
- Anticipate and Minimize Biases:Anticipate and address potential biases within the target population to help minimize their impact on the data. For example, will the sampling method accurately reflect all ages, gender, cultures, etc., of the target population? Are there barriers to participation for any subgroups? The sampling method should allow us to capture the most accurate representation of the target population.
- Maintain Cost-Effective Practices: Consider the cost implications of the chosen sampling methods. Some sampling methods will require more resources, time, and effort. The chosen sampling method should balance the cost factors with the ability to collect data effectively and accurately.
- Consider the Project’s Objectives: Tailor the sampling method to meet the specific objectives and constraints, such as M&E teams requiring real-time impact data and researchers needing representative samples for statistical analysis.
By adhering to these guidelines, we can make informed choices when selecting a sampling method, maximizing the quality and relevance of the data collection efforts.
5. Identify and train the data collection team
Not every data collection use case requires data collectors, but training individuals responsible for data collection becomes crucial in scenarios involving field presence.
Whether we’re hiring and training data collectors, utilizing an existing team, or training existing field staff, we offer comprehensive guidance and the right tools to ensure effective data collection practices. Here are some common training approaches for data collectors:
- In-Class Training: Comprehensive sessions covering protocols, survey instruments, and best practices empower data collectors with skills and knowledge.
- Tests and Assessments: Assessments evaluate collectors’ understanding and competence, highlighting areas where additional support is needed.
- Mock Interviews:Simulated interviews refine collectors’ techniques and communication skills.
- Pre-Recorded Training Sessions: Accessible reinforcement and self-paced learning to refresh and stay updated.
Training data collectors is vital for successful data collection techniques. The training should focus on proper instrument usage and effective interaction with respondents, including communication skills, cultural literacy, and ethical considerations. We understand training is an ongoing process. Knowledge gaps and issues may arise in the field, necessitating further training.
6. Design and test the survey tools
Designing effective data collection instruments like surveys and questionnaires is key. It’s crucial to prioritize respondent consent and privacy to ensure the integrity of the research. Thoughtful design and careful testing of survey questions are essential for optimizing research insights. Other critical considerations are:
- Clear and Unbiased Question Wording: Crafting unambiguous, neutral questions free from bias to gather accurate and meaningful data is crucial.
- Logical Ordering and Appropriate Response Format: Arrange questions logically and choose response formats (such as multiple-choice, Likert scale, or open-ended) that suit the nature of the data we seek to collect.
- Coverage of Relevant Topics: we ensure that our instrument covers all topics pertinent to the data collection goals while respecting cultural and social sensitivities. We make sure our instrument avoids assumptions, stereotypes, and languages or topics that could be considered offensive or taboo in certain contexts. The goal is to avoid marginalizing or offending respondents based on their social or cultural background.
- Collect Only Necessary Data:We design survey instruments that focus solely on gathering the data required for the research objectives, avoiding unnecessary information.
- Language(s) of the Respondent Population: We tailor our instruments to accommodate the languages the target respondents speak, offering translated versions if needed. Similarly, we take into account accessibility for respondents who can’t read by offering alternative formats like images in place of text.
- Desired Length of Time for Completion:Respect respondents’ time by designing instruments that can be completed within a reasonable timeframe, balancing thoroughness with engagement. Having a general timeframe for the amount of time needed to complete a response will also help us weed out bad responses. For example, a response that was rushed and completed outside of the response timeframe could indicate a response that needs to be excluded.
- Collecting and Documenting Respondents’ Consent and Privacy: We ensure a robust consent process, transparent data usage communication, and privacy protection throughout data collection.
Put the Instrument to the Test
Through rigorous testing, we uncover flaws, ensure reliability, maximize accuracy, and validate the instrument’s performance. This can be achieved by:
- Conducting pilot testingto enhance the reliability and effectiveness of data collection. Administer the instrument, identify difficulties, gather feedback, and assess performance in real-world conditions.
- Making revisionsbased on pilot testing to enhance clarity, accuracy, usability, and participant satisfaction. Refine questions, instructions, and format for effective data collection.
- Continuously iterating and refining the instrument based on feedback and real-world testing. This ensures reliable, accurate, and audience-aligned methods of data collection. Additionally, this ensures the instrument adapts to changes, incorporates insights, and maintains ongoing effectiveness.
7. Collect the data
Now that we have well-designed survey, interview questions, observation plan, or form, it’s time to implement it and gather the needed data. Data collection is not a one-and-done deal; it’s an ongoing process that demands attention to detail. Imagine spending weeks collecting data, only to discover later that a significant portion is unusable due to incomplete responses, improper collection methods, or falsified responses. To avoid such setbacks, we adopt an iterative approach.
We leverage data collection tools with real-time monitoring to proactively identify outliers and issues. We take immediate action by fine-tuning the instruments, optimizing the data collection process, addressing concerns like additional training, or reevaluating personnel responsible for inaccurate data (for example, a field worker who sits in a coffee shop entering fake responses rather than doing the work of knocking on doors).
8. Clean and organize the data
After data collection, the next step is to clean and organize the data to ensure its integrity and usability.
- Data Cleaning: This stage involves sifting through the data to identify and rectify any errors, inconsistencies, or missing values. It’s essential to maintain the accuracy of the data and ensure that it’s reliable for further analysis. Data cleaning can uncover duplicates, outliers, and gaps that could skew the results if left unchecked. With real-time data monitoring, this continuous cleaning process keeps the data precise and current throughout the data collection period. Similarly, review and corrections workflows allow us to monitor the quality of the incoming data.
- Organizing the Data: Post-cleaning, it’s time to organize the data for efficient analysis and interpretation. Labeling the data using appropriate codes or categorizations can simplify navigation and streamline the extraction of insights. When we use a survey or form, labeling the data is often not necessary because we can design the instrument to collect in the right categories or return the right codes. An organized dataset is easier to manage, analyze, and interpret, ensuring that our collection efforts are not wasted but lead to valuable, actionable insights.
Each stage of the data collection process, from design to cleaning, is iterative and interconnected. By diligently cleaning and organizing the data, we are setting the stage for robust, meaningful analysis that can inform our clients’ data-driven decisions and actions.
9. Safely store and handle data
Throughout the data collection process, and after it has been collected, it is vital that we follow best practices for storing and handling data to ensure the integrity of the research. While the specifics of how to best store and handle data will depend on the project, here are some important guidelines we keep in mind regarding data storage and handling.
- We Use cloud storageto hold our data if possible, since this is safer than storing data on hard drives and keeps it more accessible,
- We Periodically back up and purge old datafrom our system, since it’s safer to not retain data longer than necessary,
- When we use mobile devices or tablets to collect and store data, we use options for private, internal apps-specific storageif and when possible,
- We restrict access to stored data to only those who need to work with that data.
We uphold ethical standards in interpreting and reporting our data. Clear communication, respectful handling of sensitive information, and adhering to confidentiality and privacy rights are all essential to fostering trust, promoting transparency, and bolstering our work’s credibility.
Cross-Border Infrastructure, Trade and Investment
Sectoral focus of our services arise from a combination of existing expertise within the firm and selection of topics pertinent to the socio-economic realities of countries we are operating in. As such, we offer a wide range of expertise across different sectors, helping our clients address complex challenges and achieve their goals. The following are among the list of sectors we provide expertise on:
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- Youth Employment and Skill Development
- Green Energy Transition
- Digital Economy
- Cross-Border Infrastructure, Trade and Investment
- Climate Change and Migration
- Cities and Development
- Early Childhood Development
- Public Finance Management and Fiscal Transparency
- Private Sector Development and Business Advocacy
Climate Change and Migration
Sectoral focus of our services arise from a combination of existing expertise within the firm and selection of topics pertinent to the socio-economic realities of countries we are operating in. As such, we offer a wide range of expertise across different sectors, helping our clients address complex challenges and achieve their goals. The following are among the list of sectors we provide expertise on:
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- Youth Employment and Skill Development
- Green Energy Transition
- Digital Economy
- Cross-Border Infrastructure, Trade and Investment
- Climate Change and Migration
- Cities and Development
- Early Childhood Development
- Public Finance Management and Fiscal Transparency
- Private Sector Development and Business Advocacy
Digital Economy
Sectoral focus of our services arise from a combination of existing expertise within the firm and selection of topics pertinent to the socio-economic realities of countries we are operating in. As such, we offer a wide range of expertise across different sectors, helping our clients address complex challenges and achieve their goals. The following are among the list of sectors we provide expertise on:
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- Youth Employment and Skill Development
- Green Energy Transition
- Digital Economy
- Cross-Border Infrastructure, Trade and Investment
- Climate Change and Migration
- Cities and Development
- Early Childhood Development
- Public Finance Management and Fiscal Transparency
- Private Sector Development and Business Advocacy
Green Energy Transition
Sectoral focus of our services arise from a combination of existing expertise within the firm and selection of topics pertinent to the socio-economic realities of countries we are operating in. As such, we offer a wide range of expertise across different sectors, helping our clients address complex challenges and achieve their goals. The following are among the list of sectors we provide expertise on:
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- Youth Employment and Skill Development
- Green Energy Transition
- Digital Economy
- Cross-Border Infrastructure, Trade and Investment
- Climate Change and Migration
- Cities and Development
- Early Childhood Development
- Public Finance Management and Fiscal Transparency
- Private Sector Development and Business Advocacy